From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bronson v. Love

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit
Feb 26, 1997
107 F.3d 861 (3d Cir. 1997)

Summary

holding that "a private litigant cannot maintain a Title VII claim where his or her EEOC charge was not verified prior to the EEOC's issuance of a right to sue letter"

Summary of this case from Vason v. City of Montgomery

Opinion

2-26-1997

Purcell Bronson v. Superintendent Love, Ms. Shope, Sgt. Gabluk, C.O. Wakefield, C.O. Pfuhler, Lt. Briggs, Lt. Faust, D. Baney NO. 96-7501


Purcell Bronson
v.
Superintendent Love, Ms. Shope, Sgt. Gabluk, C.O. Wakefield,
C.O. Pfuhler, Lt. Briggs, Lt. Faust, D. Baney

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

Appeal From: M.D.Pa. ,No.95cv01509 , Rambo, J.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Bronson v. Love

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit
Feb 26, 1997
107 F.3d 861 (3d Cir. 1997)

holding that "a private litigant cannot maintain a Title VII claim where his or her EEOC charge was not verified prior to the EEOC's issuance of a right to sue letter"

Summary of this case from Vason v. City of Montgomery
Case details for

Bronson v. Love

Case Details

Full title:Purcell Bronson v. Superintendent Love, Ms. Shope, Sgt. Gabluk, C.O…

Court:United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit

Date published: Feb 26, 1997

Citations

107 F.3d 861 (3d Cir. 1997)

Citing Cases

Vason v. City of Montgomery

Other circuits have held that the verification requirement for EEOC charges is mandatory. See, e.g., Hodges…

Vason v. City of Montgomery, Ala.

The court has found several cases from other circuits on point. See Balazs v. Liebenthal, 32 F.3d 151 (4th…