From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barfield v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 8, 1977
348 So. 2d 621 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Opinion

No. 76-1779.

July 8, 1977.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Russell H. McIntosh, J.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Mitchell J. Beers, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Anthony J. Golden, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


This is an appeal of an order denying, without hearing, a motion to vacate filed by the appellant, Eugene Barfield, pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850.

Barfield asserted in his motion that he was denied effective assistance of counsel, citing numerous instances of claimed neglect by his court-appointed counsel. The trial court ruled that the allegations were insufficient.

An evidentiary hearing is required on Rule 3.850 motions unless the motion or record conclusively shows that the movant is entitled to no relief. We have previously held that similar allegations in a motion to vacate were sufficient to require a hearing. Lay v. State, 224 So.2d 369 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969). Accordingly, this cause is reversed and remanded for an evidentiary hearing.

DOWNEY, ALDERMAN and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Barfield v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 8, 1977
348 So. 2d 621 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)
Case details for

Barfield v. State

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE BARFIELD, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jul 8, 1977

Citations

348 So. 2d 621 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Citing Cases

Young v. State

The motion for post-conviction relief was sufficient on its face, and in the absence of a copy of that…

Thornton v. State

ANSTEAD, Judge, specially concurring. I agree that the trial court did not err in denying without hearing the…