From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barber v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 24, 1997
699 So. 2d 325 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case No. 96-1309

Opinion filed September 24, 1997.

An appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(d) from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Steven Shea, Judge.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Craig J. Trocino, Assistant Public Defender. for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Linda S. Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before NESBITT, COPE, and FLETCHER, JJ.


Darren Barber appeals his habitual felony offender classification and resultant enhanced sentence for possession of cocaine with intent to sell, arguing that Section 775.084(1)(a)(3), Florida Statutes (1995), does not permit such classification for this crime. We agree.

In May 1996, Barber was charged with and convicted of the following offenses: (1) sale of cocaine and (2) possession of cocaine with intent to sell or distribute. The court below applied the habitual felony offender statute, Section 775.084(1)(a)(3), Florida Statutes (1995), to both offenses and sentenced Barber to fifteen (15) years on each count, the sentences to run concurrently.

Barber argues that the trial court erred in sentencing him as a habitual offender for the conviction on possession of cocaine with the intent to sell. Section 775.084(1)(a)(3), Florida Statutes (1995), does not permit enhanced sentencing as a habitual offender if the felony is "a violation of Section 893.13 relating to the purchase or possession of a controlled substance." Here, Barber's conviction of possession of cocaine with intent to sell is a violation of Section 893.13 and so falls within this prohibition. We find, and the State concedes, that the habitual felony offender classification and resultant enhanced sentence the trial court imposed on Barber was improper as it concerns the possession conviction. Grene v. State, 21 Fla. L. Weekly D1145 (Fla. 3d DCA May 15, 1996); Perez v. State, 647 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995).

Although the habitual felony offender statute was properly applied to the sale of cocaine charge, we vacate the sentences on both charges below and remand to the trial court for resentencing on the conviction of both charges.

Sentences below vacated; remanded to trial court for resentencing.


Summaries of

Barber v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 24, 1997
699 So. 2d 325 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Barber v. State

Case Details

Full title:DARREN BARBER, APPELLANT, vs. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Sep 24, 1997

Citations

699 So. 2d 325 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

Pittman v. State

Defendant argues that his ten (10) year sentence on the charge of possession of cocaine is illegal because…

Ellis v. State

The habitual felony offender sentencing statute specifically exempts from its application criminal defendants…