From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 15, 1986
488 So. 2d 161 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

No. BE-327.

May 15, 1986.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County; Donald R. Moran, Jr., Judge.

Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, and Kenneth D. Driggs, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Royall P. Terry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.


The disposition on review, imposing adult sanctions on a juvenile defendant without full compliance with the mandate of Section 39.111(6)(c) and (d), Florida Statutes (1983), must be vacated and remanded for resentencing, as required by State v. Rhoden, 448 So.2d 1013 (Fla. 1984). The trial court shall consider each of the criteria enumerated in Section 39.111(6)(c), conduct a disposition hearing consonant with the direction of Section 39.111(6)(a), and reduce to writing the findings of fact and the reasons for imposing adult sanctions.

The disposition imposed is reversed and the cause remanded for redisposition in conformance with Section 39.111(6)(c) and (d), Florida Statutes.

BOOTH, C.J., and SMITH and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Banks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 15, 1986
488 So. 2d 161 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

Banks v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHIAH BANKS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: May 15, 1986

Citations

488 So. 2d 161 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Citing Cases

Taylor v. State

Because we find that the trial court failed to fully comply with Section 39.111(7), we reverse and remand for…

Peterson v. State

In sentencing appellant as an adult, the trial court failed to comply with the requirements of Section…