From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bank First v. Guillem

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division
Jun 30, 2009
Case No. 6:09-cv-152-Orl-31KRS (M.D. Fla. Jun. 30, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 6:09-cv-152-Orl-31KRS.

June 30, 2009


ORDER


This cause comes before the Court on the Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default Judgment against Defendants (Doc. No. 19) filed April 14, 2009.

On June 11, 2009, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a report (Doc. No. 20) recommending that the motion be granted. No objections have been filed. Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation is CONFIRMED and ADOPTED as part of this Order.

2. The Motion for Entry of Default Judgment against Defendants is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment for Plaintiff and against the Defendants, jointly and severally, in the amount of $38,948,135.81, plus prejudgment interest of $790,437.12, for a total of $39,738.572.93.

3. Following entry of judgment, the Clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, Orlando, Florida.


Summaries of

Bank First v. Guillem

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division
Jun 30, 2009
Case No. 6:09-cv-152-Orl-31KRS (M.D. Fla. Jun. 30, 2009)
Case details for

Bank First v. Guillem

Case Details

Full title:BANK FIRST, Plaintiff, v. BERNARD GUILLEM and WILLIAM HABERMAN, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division

Date published: Jun 30, 2009

Citations

Case No. 6:09-cv-152-Orl-31KRS (M.D. Fla. Jun. 30, 2009)

Citing Cases

Williams Holding Corp. v. Vi-Tel Wireless, LLC

"In Florida, the elements of an action for breach of a guaranty arise from a debtor's default and the…

Venus Concept U.S. Inc. v. Transforming Arts, Inc.

” Id. (quoting Bank First v. Guillem, No. 6:09-cv-152-Orl-31KRS, 2009 WL 1930190, at *5 (M.D. Fla.…