From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Balgowan v. State of New Jersey

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Jul 9, 1996
84 F.3d 667 (3d Cir. 1996)

Opinion

No. 95-5276.

Dated: July 9, 1996.

BEFORE: STAPLETON, COWEN and GARTH, Circuit Judges.


ORDER


The petition for panel rehearing filed by appellee in the above-entitled case is hereby granted, and the Opinion and Judgment filed on May 16, 1996, is hereby vacated. The parties are hereby ordered to comply with the following rebriefing schedule: Appellants' shall file their opening brief within 30 days from the date of this order; appellee shall file its answering brief 30 days thereafter and any reply by appellants' shall be filed 15 days thereafter. Briefing shall be on all issues raised by the parties including, but not limited to, the issues raised in the Petition for Rehearing and the Answer filed to the Petition.

The court observes that appellants have requested transfer to the state court. Does such a procedure exist under New Jersey law? If appellants were to file in state court at this time, does New Jersey law toll the statute of limitations on plaintiffs' cause of action for the period of time that the matter was pending in federal court? In light of the briefing order entered herein which may encompass the subject of the June 28, 1996 letter motion it desired, that motion by appellee to supplement the record on the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied.

By the Court,

/s/ Robert E. Cowen, Circuit Judge

Dated: July 9, 1996.


Summaries of

Balgowan v. State of New Jersey

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Jul 9, 1996
84 F.3d 667 (3d Cir. 1996)
Case details for

Balgowan v. State of New Jersey

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD M. BALGOWAN; THOMAS M. BATZ; THOMAS BETTEN; KARL L. BLUM; RAYMOND…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Jul 9, 1996

Citations

84 F.3d 667 (3d Cir. 1996)

Citing Cases

Balgowan v. State of New Jersey

The State filed a petition for rehearing, relying in part on the Supreme Court's Seminole decision. By order…