From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baird v. Maguire

Superior Court of California, Appellate Division, San Bernardino
Jun 3, 1954
125 Cal.App.2d Supp. 907 (Cal. Super. 1954)

Opinion


125 Cal.App.2d Supp. 907 271 P.2d 233 GENE BAIRD et al., Appellants, v. EVERETT MAGUIRE et al., Respondents. Civ. A. No. 18. Appellate Department, Superior Court, San Bernardino June 3, 1954

         COUNSEL

         Swing & Gillespie for Appellants. H. R. Griffin for Respondents.          

         OPINION

         COUGHLIN, P. J.

         This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants in a claim and delivery action involving the possession of an automobile.

         The appellants contend that the evidence is not sufficient to sustain this judgment. The record before this court does not include either a settled statement of facts or a reporter's transcript of the oral proceedings before the trial court. Under these circumstances on appeal it must be presumed that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the judgment.

         The judgment is affirmed.

         Hilliard, J., and Mitchell, J., concurred.


Summaries of

Baird v. Maguire

Superior Court of California, Appellate Division, San Bernardino
Jun 3, 1954
125 Cal.App.2d Supp. 907 (Cal. Super. 1954)
Case details for

Baird v. Maguire

Case Details

Full title:Baird v. Maguire

Court:Superior Court of California, Appellate Division, San Bernardino

Date published: Jun 3, 1954

Citations

125 Cal.App.2d Supp. 907 (Cal. Super. 1954)
271 P.2d 233

Citing Cases

San Diego Mun. Credit Union v. Smith

The remedy to enforce the payment of debt is gone, but the moral obligation to pay it still remains and is…

Public Finance Corp. v. Shaw

(See the dissenting opinion in Helms v. Holmes, 129 F.2d 263, 269 [141 A.L.R. 1367], for an excellent…