Babb v. Regal Marine Indus., Inc.

Full title: Chuck BABB, Respondent, v. REGAL MARINE INDUSTRIES, INC., Petitioner.

Court: Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Jul 9, 2014

180 Wn. 2d 1021 (Wash. 2014)

180 Wash. 2d 1021

329 P.3d 67

Opinion

No. 90086–8.

2014-07-9

Chuck BABB, Respondent, v. REGAL MARINE INDUSTRIES, INC., Petitioner.

MADSEN

Prior report: Wash.App., 179 Wash.App. 1036, 2014 WL 690154.

ORDER

, Chief Justice.

¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices C. Johnson, Fairhurst, Wiggins, and Gordon McCloud, considered at its July 8, 2014, Motion Calendar, whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the Petition for Review is granted and the matter is remanded to the Court of Appeals to consider the Petitioner's argument that its lack of contractual privity with the Respondent precluded Respondent's breach of implied warranty of merchantability claim.