From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Averett v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 8, 2009
10 So. 3d 1135 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

No. 4D09-166.

May 20, 2009. Rehearing Denied July 8, 2009.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Jeffrey R. Levenson, Judge; L.T. Case No. 98-18895 CF10A.

Kevin D. Averett, Pompano Beach, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.


The defendant appeals the denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a).

With respect to that part of his first ground for relief in which he claimed that the judgment did not properly reflect the title and statute number of the offense for which he was charged in count V, and to which he entered a negotiated plea, we affirm without prejudice to his filing a motion to correct a scrivener's error pursuant Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(a). See Branson v. State, 951 So.2d 980 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); Wells v. State, 796 So.2d 1276 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (noting that, in Boggs v. Wainwright, 223 So.2d 316 (Fla. 1969), the supreme court effectively adopted Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.540(a) ("Clerical mistakes in judgments, decrees, or other parts of the record and errors therein arising from oversight or omission may be corrected by the court at any time on its own initiative or on the motion of any party and after such notice, if any, as the court orders."), for use in criminal cases).

In all other respects, we affirm.

FARMER, MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Averett v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 8, 2009
10 So. 3d 1135 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

Averett v. State

Case Details

Full title:Kevin D. AVERETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jul 8, 2009

Citations

10 So. 3d 1135 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

Citing Cases

Carrion v. State

As the majority notes, a court has authority to "correct clerical mistakes in its own judgments and records."…