From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Austin v. Haley

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Jul 25, 2002
212 F. Supp. 2d 1339 (M.D. Ala. 2002)

Opinion

No. Civ.A. 95-T-637-N

July 25, 2002

J. Richard Cohen, Morris S. Dees, Jr., Rhonda Brownstein, Ellen M. Bowden, Montgomery, AL, Roy S. Haber, Roy S. Haber, P.C., Eugene, OR, for Plaintiffs.

William F. Addison, Edward A. Hosp, Office of the Governor, Montgomery, AL, for Defendants.


ORDER


Counsel for defendant Michael Haley having indicated during a conference on July 24, 2002, that, in light of Hope v. Pelzer, ___ U.S. ___, 122 S.Ct. 2508, ___ L.Ed.2d ___ (2002), the Alabama Department of Corrections does not intend to resume use of the hitching post or restraining bar, it is ORDERED that any additional relief in this litigation is unnecessary and thus is denied. Austin v. Hopper, 15 F. Supp.2d 1210, 1272-1274 (M.D. Ala. 1998) (discussing what additional relief, if any, might be appropriate).

It is further ORDERED that the plaintiffs are allowed until August 7, 2002, to file any request for attorney's fees, expenses, and costs.


Summaries of

Austin v. Haley

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Jul 25, 2002
212 F. Supp. 2d 1339 (M.D. Ala. 2002)
Case details for

Austin v. Haley

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL A. AUSTIN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL HALEY, Acting…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division

Date published: Jul 25, 2002

Citations

212 F. Supp. 2d 1339 (M.D. Ala. 2002)