From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Austin v. Certegy Payment Recovery Servs., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Feb 11, 2014
Case No.: 2:11-CV-00401-RDP (N.D. Ala. Feb. 11, 2014)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:11-CV-00401-RDP

02-11-2014

TIFFANY AUSTIN, Plaintiff, v. CERTEGY PAYMENT RECOVERY SERVICES, INC., and CERTEGY CHECK SERVICES, INC., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation (Doc. #124) on January 13, 2014, recommending that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #58) be granted. The parties were advised of their right to file specific written objections. Plaintiff has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. (Doc. #125). Defendants responded to Plaintiff's objections. (Doc. #127).

Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff's objections, and Defendants' response, the court is of the opinion that the Magistrate Judge's Report is due to be and hereby is ADOPTED and the Recommendation is ACCEPTED. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #58) is GRANTED and that final judgment be entered in favor of Defendants. All of Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

__________

R. DAVID PROCTOR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Austin v. Certegy Payment Recovery Servs., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Feb 11, 2014
Case No.: 2:11-CV-00401-RDP (N.D. Ala. Feb. 11, 2014)
Case details for

Austin v. Certegy Payment Recovery Servs., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TIFFANY AUSTIN, Plaintiff, v. CERTEGY PAYMENT RECOVERY SERVICES, INC., and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 11, 2014

Citations

Case No.: 2:11-CV-00401-RDP (N.D. Ala. Feb. 11, 2014)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Equifax Info. Servs., Inc.

That provision governs Fair Credit Reporting Act pre-emption of state law claims; it does not provide a basis…

Taylor v. Midland Funding, LLC

By way of background, when enacted in 1970, the FCRA imposed obligations on consumer reporting agencies, but…