From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Augustus v. Bd., Pub. Inst. of Escambia Cty

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Dec 29, 1969
420 F.2d 778 (5th Cir. 1969)

Opinion

No. 28111.

December 29, 1969.

S. Gunter Toney, Toney Guarisco, Tallahassee, Fla., for intervenors-appellants.

Theodore R. Bowers, Panama City, Fla., William L. Robinson, Jack Greenberg, Norman J. Chachkin, James M. Nabrit, III, Drew S. Days, III, New York City, for plaintiffs-appellees.

J. Edwin Holsberry, Pensacola, Fla., for other interested parties.

Before GEWIN, GOLDBERG and DYER, Circuit Judges.


After having given consideration to the appendix and the briefs filed in said cause by the parties, this court is of the opinion that the district court did not commit error in refusing to allow intervention in this cause by the Intervenors-Appellants. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Augustus v. Bd., Pub. Inst. of Escambia Cty

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Dec 29, 1969
420 F.2d 778 (5th Cir. 1969)
Case details for

Augustus v. Bd., Pub. Inst. of Escambia Cty

Case Details

Full title:Karen Renee AUGUSTUS, a minor, by Charles A. Augustus, her father and next…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Dec 29, 1969

Citations

420 F.2d 778 (5th Cir. 1969)

Citing Cases

Sims v. Board of Educ. of Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 22

More than one trial court has observed that "Additional parties always take additional time" and that "they…