From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aspex Eyewear v. Ross

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 21, 2001
778 So. 2d 481 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Summary

noting party's financial records are discoverable when "the documents themselves or the status which they evidence" are at issue

Summary of this case from PDR Grayson Dental Lab, LLC v. Progressive Dental Reconstruction, Inc.

Opinion

No. 4D00-3936.

Opinion filed February 21, 2001.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Miette K. Burnstein, Judge; L.T. Case No. 99-20516 CACE 21.

Accordingly, we dismiss the petition in part and deny the petition in part.

Arie Mrejen of Arie Mrejen, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.

No response required for respondent.


Aspex Eyewear, Inc., seeks review of a non-final order of the Broward County circuit court which denied its initial and revised Motions for Protective Order and granted Respondent's Motion for Sanctions. We dismiss in part and deny in part.

Ordinarily the financial records of a party are not discoverable unless the documents themselves or the status which they evidence is somehow at issue in the case. See Graphic Assocs., Inc. v. Riviana Rest. Corp., 461 So.2d 1011 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). The profits of Petitioner are relevant to the damages element of an alleged "profit" sharing participation agreement, thus, making the financial records sought by Respondent relevant. As to any alleged confidential or classified trade secrets of the petitioner or the non-parties, the trial court, upon appropriate motion, can easily fashion safeguards to prevent dissemination of this information to other entities which are not involved in the litigation. See Crocker Constr. Co. v. Hornsby, 562 So.2d 842 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

Petitioner claims the production ordered by the trial court is irrelevant. To the extent this may be true, we lack jurisdiction as the production of irrelevant material does not rise to the level of irreparable harm for certiorari to lie. See Coyne v. Schwartz, Gold, Cohen, Zakarin Kotler, P.A., 715 So.2d 1021, 1023 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Eberhardt v. Eberhardt, 666 So.2d 1024 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), approved by Allstate Ins. Co. v. Boecher, 733 So.2d 993, 998-99 (Fla. 1999).

Accordingly, we dismiss the petition in part and deny the petition in part.

FARMER, STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Aspex Eyewear v. Ross

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 21, 2001
778 So. 2d 481 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

noting party's financial records are discoverable when "the documents themselves or the status which they evidence" are at issue

Summary of this case from PDR Grayson Dental Lab, LLC v. Progressive Dental Reconstruction, Inc.

noting party's financial records are discoverable when "the documents themselves or the status which they evidence" are at issue

Summary of this case from pdrGrayson Dental Lab, LLC v. Progressive Dental Reconstruction, Inc.
Case details for

Aspex Eyewear v. Ross

Case Details

Full title:ASPEX EYEWEAR, INC., Petitioner, v. JERROLD ROSS, Respondent

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Feb 21, 2001

Citations

778 So. 2d 481 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Yormak v. Yormak

The court in Bd. of Trusteesdid recognize, however, that "[g]enerally, private individual financial…

pdrGrayson Dental Lab, LLC v. Progressive Dental Reconstruction, Inc.

The representative of the accounting firm testified that information in the tax records and tax returns is…