From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ASIS INTERNET SERVICES v. OPTIN GLOBAL, INC.

United States District Court, N.D. California
Apr 29, 2008
No. C 05-05124 JCS (N.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2008)

Summary

finding that plaintiff did not have standing under the Act where plaintiff had provided no evidence of a structural harm

Summary of this case from Haselton v. Quicken Loans, Inc.

Opinion

No. C 05-05124 JCS.

April 29, 2008


JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE


() Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

(X) Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Order Granting Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and Dismissing Action filed on March 27, 2008, judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Azoogle and Plaintiff's claims against Azoogle are dismissed with prejudice.


Summaries of

ASIS INTERNET SERVICES v. OPTIN GLOBAL, INC.

United States District Court, N.D. California
Apr 29, 2008
No. C 05-05124 JCS (N.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2008)

finding that plaintiff did not have standing under the Act where plaintiff had provided no evidence of a structural harm

Summary of this case from Haselton v. Quicken Loans, Inc.
Case details for

ASIS INTERNET SERVICES v. OPTIN GLOBAL, INC.

Case Details

Full title:ASIS INTERNET SERVICES, Plaintiff, v. OPTIN GLOBAL, INC. ET AL, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Apr 29, 2008

Citations

No. C 05-05124 JCS (N.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2008)

Citing Cases

Hypertouch, Inc. v. ValueClick, Inc.

(See Consumerbargaingiveaways, supra, 622 F.Supp.2d at p. 941; Asis Internet Services v. Vistaprint USA, Inc.…

Haselton v. Quicken Loans, Inc.

In addition, plaintiffs have alleged structural and client-focused harms that extend beyond merely receiving…