From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ashrafi v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 7, 1988
534 So. 2d 886 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 87-3267.

December 7, 1988.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Broward County; Patti Englander Henning, Judge.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Allen J. DeWeese, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Alfonso M. Saldana, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Defendant appeals the revocation of his community control and sentence of three and a half years in prison for failure to re-enroll in a psychological therapy program for sex offenders. Defendant's community control officer instructed him to re-enroll in a program after he was dropped for absenteeism. Our review of the record, particularly the order of community control, shows that enrollment in such a program was not made an express condition of the community control by the trial court.

Accordingly, this matter is reversed on the authority of Morales v. State, 518 So.2d 964 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), Hutchinson v. State, 428 So.2d 739 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983) and Holterhaus v. State, 417 So.2d 291 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). We remand this matter to the trial court with instructions to restore defendant to his original term of community control.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DELL and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

STONE, J., dissents without opinion.


Summaries of

Ashrafi v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 7, 1988
534 So. 2d 886 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

Ashrafi v. State

Case Details

Full title:SEYED ASHRAFI, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Dec 7, 1988

Citations

534 So. 2d 886 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

Waldon v. State

The state thus argues that all of her arguments have been waived by both her agreement and her failure to…

Mathis v. State

Rather this condition was imposed by the probation officer as a means to avoid revoking appellant's probation…