From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Applestein v. Simons

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 25, 1991
586 So. 2d 441 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-2065.

September 17, 1991. Rehearing Denied October 25, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Martin Greenbaum, J.

Jeffrey C. Roth, Coral Gables, for appellant.

Alfred Gustinger, Jr., Miami, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, JORGENSON and GERSTEN, JJ.


We find error in the trial court holding that the interest rate on a judgment increased at various times in accordance with statutory increases enacted by the Legislature. Judgment was entered on the 19th day of September, 1979, and at that time interest accrued at the rate of 8% per annum on judgments rendered in circuit court. The interest rate on judgments was increased to 10%, effective October 1, 1980. The interest rate on judgments was again increased to 12%, effective October 1, 1981.

Generally the interest rate would change on an unsatisfied final judgment as the statute proscribing the rate of interest is amended, unless otherwise provided in the basic agreement upon which the final judgment was rendered. See Glades County, Fla. v. Kurtz, 101 F.2d 759 (5th Cir. 1939); Anno. 41 ALR 4th 694, § 6 p. 703 and cases cited therein. However, in the instant case the several statutes which alter the interest rate specifically excluded the application of the new rate in a retroactive manner. Therefore, for reasons stated, the final order under review is reversed and remanded to the trial court for reconsideration and the entry of a total amount due based on interest accrued at the rate of 8% per annum in accordance with Sec. 55.03(1), Florida Statutes (1991).

Chapter 80-110, Section 2. "This act shall apply to any judgment or decree entered on or after the effective date of this act.
Section 3., This act shall take effect October 1, 1980."
Chapter 81-113, "(1) A judgment or decree entered on or after October 1, 1981 shall bear interest at the rate of 12 percent a year unless the judgment or decree is rendered on a written contract or obligation providing for interest at a lesser rate, in which case the judgment or decree bears interest at the rate specified in such written contract or obligation."

Reversed and remanded with directions.


Summaries of

Applestein v. Simons

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 25, 1991
586 So. 2d 441 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Applestein v. Simons

Case Details

Full title:ALLEN R. APPLESTEIN, APPELLANT, v. GUSTAVE SIMONS AND NATIONAL SURETY…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Oct 25, 1991

Citations

586 So. 2d 441 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Townsend

See Glades Cnty. v. Kurtz, 101 F.2d 759, 759–60 (5th Cir.1939) (holding that that the amendment to the…

Townsend v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

On the one hand, the common law default rule cases stand for the proposition that the post-judgment interest…