From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Amos v. United States

U.S.
Oct 25, 1926
273 U.S. 713 (1926)

Opinion

No. 643.

October 25, 1926.


Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The motion for leave to print only such portions of the record in this case as opposing counsel shall agree is relevant to petitioner's conviction below or in the alternative to proceed further in forma pauperis is denied for the reason that upon examination of the petition and accompanying papers, including brief of counsel for the petitioner, the record as printed in the Circuit Court of Appeals, and the opinion of the court below, the court finds that the case is not one in which a writ of certiorari should issue, the application for which is, therefore, also denied. Mr. Walter S. Hilborn for petitioner. Solicitor General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Luhring, and Mr. Harry S. Ridgely for the United States.


Summaries of

Amos v. United States

U.S.
Oct 25, 1926
273 U.S. 713 (1926)
Case details for

Amos v. United States

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM C. AMOS v. UNITED STATES

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 25, 1926

Citations

273 U.S. 713 (1926)

Citing Cases

Fuller v. State

9; 7 Ala.Dig., Crim. Law, 935, 1159(2), (3), (4), 1160; 11 Ala.Dig., Homicide, 332(2); Brown v. State, 30…

U.S. v. MacDonald Watson Waste Oil Co.

However, the jury is permitted to impute knowledge of the falsity of the statements to the accused, not as a…