From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Amersham Enters. v. Hakim-Daccach

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 8, 2022
No. SC22-409 (Fla. Sep. 8, 2022)

Opinion

SC22-409 SC22-422

09-08-2022

AMERSHAM ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. Petitioner(s) v. CARLOS HAKIM-DACCACH, ET AL. Respondent(s) KNAUF DE COLOMBIA, S.A.S., ETC., ET AL. Petitioner(s) v. CARLOS HAKIM-DACCACH, ET AL. Respondent(s)


Lower Tribunal No(s).: 3D20-1566; 3D20-1569; 3D20-1570; 132017CA001358000001

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court on jurisdictional briefs and portions of the record deemed necessary to reflect jurisdiction under Article V, Section 3(b), Florida Constitution, and the Court having determined that it should decline to accept jurisdiction, it is ordered that the petition for review is denied.

No motion for rehearing will be entertained by the Court. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.330(d)(2).

CANADY, POLSTON, LABARGA, COURIEL, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.

HON. BEATRICE AVGHERINO BUTCHKO, JUDGE


Summaries of

Amersham Enters. v. Hakim-Daccach

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 8, 2022
No. SC22-409 (Fla. Sep. 8, 2022)
Case details for

Amersham Enters. v. Hakim-Daccach

Case Details

Full title:AMERSHAM ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. Petitioner(s) v. CARLOS HAKIM-DACCACH…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Sep 8, 2022

Citations

No. SC22-409 (Fla. Sep. 8, 2022)

Citing Cases

Basulto v. Netflix, Inc.

It follows that “acts of a conspirator in furtherance of a conspiracy may be attributed to the other members…