From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ameritas Life Ins. Corp. v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
Feb 14, 2018
4:17-CV-3127 (D. Neb. Feb. 14, 2018)

Opinion

4:17-CV-3127

02-14-2018

AMERITAS LIFE INSURANCE CORP., Plaintiff, v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE & CO., Defendant.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the defendant's motion to dismiss (filing 9). Specifically, the defendant, J.P. Morgan Chase Bank N.A. (named as J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.) argues that the claims asserted by the plaintiff, Ameritas Life Insurance Corporation, should be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Filing 9.

The Court has reviewed Ameritas' complaint and the parties' briefs. The Court has also reviewed Judge Kopf's Memorandum and Order in Ameritas Life Ins. Corp. v. Bank of America, N.A., which addressed essentially identical claims. No. 4:17-CV-3128 (D. Neb. filed Jan. 31, 2018). The Court agrees with Judge Kopf's thoughtful and well-reasoned decision. See id. Specifically, the Court agrees with Judge Kopf's conclusion that given the facts alleged, Ameritas owed no legal duty to Chase under Nebraska law, and accordingly, Ameritas has failed to state a claim for negligence. Ameritas, No. 4:17-CV-3128, slip op. at 6-15. The Court further agrees that to the extent Ameritas is still asserting a fiduciary duty claim, but see filing 12, Chase owed Ameritas no fiduciary duty, id. at 15-16.

In deciding a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, the Court will accepts as true all facts pleaded by the plaintiff, and grants all reasonable inferences from the pleadings in its favor. Gallagher v. City of Clayton, 699 F.3d 1013, 1016 (8th Cir. 2012). But a pleading that offers labels and conclusions or a formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action will not do. Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009). The complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face. Id. at 678-79. --------

Based on Judge Kopf's thorough reasoning, with which I agree, the Court will grant Chase's motion to dismiss.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Chase's motion to dismiss (filing 9) is granted.

2. Ameritas' complaint is dismissed.

3. A separate judgment will be entered.

Dated this 14th day of February, 2018.

BY THE COURT:

/s/_________

John M. Gerrard

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Ameritas Life Ins. Corp. v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
Feb 14, 2018
4:17-CV-3127 (D. Neb. Feb. 14, 2018)
Case details for

Ameritas Life Ins. Corp. v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.

Case Details

Full title:AMERITAS LIFE INSURANCE CORP., Plaintiff, v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE & CO.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

Date published: Feb 14, 2018

Citations

4:17-CV-3127 (D. Neb. Feb. 14, 2018)

Citing Cases

Prime Foods for Processing & Trading v. Greater Omaha Packing Co.

This Court recently addressed the legal duty a bank owed to a non-customer to prevent economic harm…