From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alvarez v. Well-S Indus., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Aug 18, 2015
12-CV-8835 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 18, 2015)

Opinion

12-CV-8835 (VSB)

08-18-2015

LUIS ALVAREZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WELL-S INDUSTRIAL, INC., et al., Defendants.


ORDER :

This matter was referred to the Honorable Kevin N. Fox for an inquest into damages, costs, and attorneys' fees to be assessed against the defaulting Defendants. (See Doc. 23.) Before me is Magistrate Judge Fox's report and recommendation proposing findings from the inquest. (Doc. 112.)

In reviewing a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, a district court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Parties may raise specific, written objections to the report and recommendation within 14 days of being served with a copy of the report. Id.; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). When a party submits a timely objection, a district court reviews de novo the parts of the report and recommendation to which the party objected. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). With regard to the unobjected-to portions of a report and recommendation, a district court reviews the report and recommendation for clear error. Lewis v. Zon, 573 F. Supp. 2d 804, 811 (S.D.N.Y. 2008); Wilds v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 262 F. Supp. 2d 163, 169 (S.D.N.Y. 2003).

No party filed any objections to Magistrate Judge Fox's report and recommendation. I therefore review it for clear error only. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Finding no clear error, I hereby ADOPT the report and recommendation in its entirety.

The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment against Defendants Well-S Industrial, Inc. and Bong Jun Park a/k/a Bongjun Park in the following amounts: (1) $13,663.84 in damages to Luis Alvarez, $2,781.17 in damages to Angel Rodolfo Camas, $5,979.47 in damages to Diego Camas, $3,051.63 in damages to Luis Corasaica, $6,618.58 in damages to Angel Quille, $2,072.17 in damages to Wilson Quito, and $14,679.26 in damages to Jose Sanchez; (2) $35,730 in attorneys' fees; (3) $591.76 in costs; and (4) post-judgment interest.

The Clerk of Court is also respectfully directed to terminate the pending motion at Doc. 88 and close the case. SO ORDERED. Dated: August 18, 2015

New York, New York

/s/_________

Vernon S. Broderick

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Alvarez v. Well-S Indus., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Aug 18, 2015
12-CV-8835 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 18, 2015)
Case details for

Alvarez v. Well-S Indus., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LUIS ALVAREZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WELL-S INDUSTRIAL, INC., et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Aug 18, 2015

Citations

12-CV-8835 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 18, 2015)

Citing Cases

Medina v. Buther

(Def. Opp. at 10 (citing Alvarez v. Well-S Indus., Inc., No. 12-CV-8835(VSB), 2015 WL 4934404, at *8…

A.P. Moller-Maersk v. Safewater Lines (1) PVT, Ltd.

Because Samrat did not serve the Cross-Claim on the Safewater Defendants under Rule 4, entry of default is…