From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alliance Assur Co, Limited, of London, Eng v. Pacific Union Club

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 3, 1909
169 F. 778 (9th Cir. 1909)

Opinion


169 F. 778 (9th Cir. 1909) ALLIANCE ASSUR. CO., LIMITED, OF LONDON, ENG., v. PACIFIC UNION CLUB. No. 1,620. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 3, 1909

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California.

T. C. Van Ness, for plaintiff in error.

Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, for defendant in error.

Before GILBERT, ROSS, and MORROW, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The facts in this case are identical with those in the case of Commercial Union Assurance Company v. Pacific Union Club (No. 1,618, just disposed of) 169 F. 776, on the authority of which case the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Alliance Assur Co, Limited, of London, Eng v. Pacific Union Club

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 3, 1909
169 F. 778 (9th Cir. 1909)
Case details for

Alliance Assur Co, Limited, of London, Eng v. Pacific Union Club

Case Details

Full title:ALLIANCE ASSUR. CO., LIMITED, OF LONDON, ENG., v. PACIFIC UNION CLUB.

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 3, 1909

Citations

169 F. 778 (9th Cir. 1909)

Citing Cases

United States v. Patterson

But it seems to me, however, that the use of the word 'sole' in the affidavit as subscribed, in connection…

United States v. Nelson

' The affidavit here is not like that involved in the case of Williamson v. United States, 207 U.S. 425, 28…