From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allen v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 1, 1972
264 So. 2d 866 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

Opinion

No. Q-233.

August 1, 1972.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County, William Frye, III, J.

James R. McAtee, Pensacola, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.


Appellant seeks reversal of his conviction of first degree murder entered pursuant to a jury verdict. The victim was appellant's former wife. Death resulted when appellant shot her four times with his .38 caliber pistol.

Appellant had a history of alcoholism and alcoholic blackouts. His primary point raised on appeal is that the evidence was insufficient to prove that appellant was capable of forming the requisite intent or premeditated design to commit the murder with which he was charged. Our review of the transcript of testimony convinces us that although there was conflict in the evidence adduced on this question, that conflict was resolved by the jury against appellant. It is well settled that this court is without authority to substitute its judgment for that of a jury on conflicting questions of fact. See Sealey v. State, 46 So.2d 894 (Fla. 1950).

Accordingly, the judgment reviewed herein is affirmed.

SPECTOR, C.J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Allen v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 1, 1972
264 So. 2d 866 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)
Case details for

Allen v. State

Case Details

Full title:JIMMY GRAY ALLEN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Aug 1, 1972

Citations

264 So. 2d 866 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

Citing Cases

Mauldin v. State

This evidence, and the appellant's recollection of events immediately preceding the shooting and afterwards,…