From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adamson v. Ricketts

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 3, 1985
764 F.2d 1343 (9th Cir. 1985)

Opinion

No. 84-2069.

July 3, 1985.

Timothy K. Ford, Seattle, Wash., Timothy J. Foley, Hancock, Rothert Bunshoft, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner-appellant.

William J. Schafer, III, Phoenix, Ariz., for respondent-appellee.

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY, BOOCHEVER, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

Upon a vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be heard by the en banc court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment is withdrawn, 758 F.2d 441.


Summaries of

Adamson v. Ricketts

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 3, 1985
764 F.2d 1343 (9th Cir. 1985)
Case details for

Adamson v. Ricketts

Case Details

Full title:JOHN HARVEY ADAMSON, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. JAMES G. RICKETTS, ET AL.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jul 3, 1985

Citations

764 F.2d 1343 (9th Cir. 1985)

Citing Cases

Manlove v. Sullivan

"Conventional notions of finality of litigation have no place where life or liberty is at stake and…

Jeffers v. Ricketts

The Ninth Circuit has interpreted this language to support deferential habeas corpus review of aggravating…