From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Abramson v. Colonial Oil Company

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Mar 13, 1968
390 F.2d 873 (5th Cir. 1968)

Summary

In Abramson v. Colonial Oil Company, 390 F.2d 873 (5th Cir. 1968), cert. denied 393 U.S. 831, 89 S.Ct. 99, 21 L.Ed.2d 101 (1968), a service station owner sued its wholesaler-supplier charging price discrimination. It was held that since the supplier purchased the petroleum products within the state, the acts complained of did not occur in interstate commerce.

Summary of this case from Belliston v. Texaco, Inc.

Opinion

No. 25012.

March 13, 1968.

Walter Warren, Robert E. Austin, Jr., Leesburg, Fla., Warren, Warren Austin, Leesburg, Fla., of counsel, for appellants.

A.H. Rothstein, Samuel Kassewitz, C. Harris Dittmar, Jacksonville, Fla., Bedell, Bedell, Dittmar Smith, Jacksonville, Fla., of counsel for appellee.

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, CLAYTON, Circuit Judge and SCOTT, District Judge.


Appellants, the Abramsons, own and operate a service station in Orlando, Florida. Appellee, Colonial Oil Company, is a Florida corporation engaged in supplying at wholesale petroleum products to independent dealers and of selling petroleum products at retail through service stations operated by Colonial. The Abramsons' suit is bottomed on allegations that they were under contract to purchase petroleum products from the appellee and that during the contract period Colonial discriminated against them by selling petroleum products of like grade and quality to other service stations in the Orlando area at lower prices, thereby lessening competition and injuring appellants' business in violation of the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 13(a).

Both parties filed motions for summary judgment, and it is now undisputed in the record that during the period in question all outlets in the Orlando area which were supplied with petroleum products by Colonial, including the Abramsons' service station, were supplied with petroleum products which were purchased by Colonial within the State of Florida. Thus, the acts complained of did not occur in interstate commerce within the meaning of this statute, and this case is controlled by Jones v. Metzger Dairies, Inc., 334 F.2d 919 (5 Cir. 1964). See, also, Food Basket, Inc. v. Albertsons, Inc., 383 F.2d 785 (10 Cir. 1967).

This case must be and is

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Abramson v. Colonial Oil Company

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Mar 13, 1968
390 F.2d 873 (5th Cir. 1968)

In Abramson v. Colonial Oil Company, 390 F.2d 873 (5th Cir. 1968), cert. denied 393 U.S. 831, 89 S.Ct. 99, 21 L.Ed.2d 101 (1968), a service station owner sued its wholesaler-supplier charging price discrimination. It was held that since the supplier purchased the petroleum products within the state, the acts complained of did not occur in interstate commerce.

Summary of this case from Belliston v. Texaco, Inc.
Case details for

Abramson v. Colonial Oil Company

Case Details

Full title:Joseph O. ABRAMSON and Shirley Rita Abramson, Appellants, v. COLONIAL OIL…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Mar 13, 1968

Citations

390 F.2d 873 (5th Cir. 1968)

Citing Cases

Rose v. Materials Co.

Hiram Walker, Inc. v. A S Tropical, Inc., 407 F.2d 4 (7th Cir. 1969), cert. den. 396 U.S. 901, 24 L.Ed.2d…

Roorda v. American Oil Co.

With respect to the two Florida distributors, the court found that the undisputed facts showed that they sold…