From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

10, Pacific Maritime Association v. International Longshormen's and Warehousemen's Union, Local No. 10

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 25, 1982
685 F.2d 444 (9th Cir. 1982)

Summary

discussing the discovery rule as applied to allegations of fraudulent concealment in a products liability case

Summary of this case from McGowen Precision Barrels, LLC v. Proof Research, Inc.

Opinion


685 F.2d 444 (9th Cir. 1982) Pacific Maritime Ass'n v. International Longshoremen's and Warehousement's Union, Local No. 10 No. 80-4260 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit June 25, 1982

Editorial Note:

This opinion is published in the Federal reporter in a table titled §Table of decisions without reported opinions§. These decisions do not meet the specific criteria for publication and these decisions cannot be cited unless being used for res judicata or collateral estoppel. (Ninth Circuit Rules, Rule 36-3,28 U.S.C.A.)

N.D.Cal.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

10, Pacific Maritime Association v. International Longshormen's and Warehousemen's Union, Local No. 10

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 25, 1982
685 F.2d 444 (9th Cir. 1982)

discussing the discovery rule as applied to allegations of fraudulent concealment in a products liability case

Summary of this case from McGowen Precision Barrels, LLC v. Proof Research, Inc.
Case details for

10, Pacific Maritime Association v. International Longshormen's and Warehousemen's Union, Local No. 10

Case Details

Full title:Pacific Maritime Ass'n v. International Longshoremen's and Warehousement's…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jun 25, 1982

Citations

685 F.2d 444 (9th Cir. 1982)

Citing Cases

Montana Pole & Treating Plant v. I.F. Laucks & Co.

See, Buhl v. Biosearch Medical Products, 635 F. Supp. 956, 959 (D.Mont. 1985); Much v. Sturm, Ruger Co.,…

McGowen Precision Barrels, LLC v. Proof Research, Inc.

To the contrary, federal courts, applying Montana law, have consistently held that "a right of action in tort…