§

In the Matter of Pierre

14 I&N Dec. 467 (B.I.A. 1973)
In the Matter of Pierre

17 Cited authorities

  1. Leng May Ma v. Barber

    357 U.S. 185 (1958)   Cited 209 times
    Holding that an alien's parole into the United States "did not alter her status as an excluded alien"

  2. SIU FUNG LUK v. ROSENBERG

    409 F.2d 555 (9th Cir. 1969)   Cited 23 times
    In Luk v. Rosenberg (9 Cir. 1969), 409 F.2d 555, we held that although it might be more convenient for the alien to process his new application for admission while in the United States, the District Director's denial of a stay was not an abuse of discretion.

  3. Vitale v. Immigration Naturalization Service

    463 F.2d 579 (7th Cir. 1972)   Cited 9 times
    Holding that, for the period between inspection at the airport to alien's exclusion hearing, "[t]he placing of Vitale in the custody of Alitalia Airlines constituted parole; [so] he did not effect an entry into the United States"

  4. United States v. Vasilatos

    209 F.2d 195 (3d Cir. 1954)   Cited 27 times
    Holding that a ship crewmember "entered" the country under § 1326 when his request for admission was decided, not when he merely crossed the border into the United States

  5. Glavic v. Beechie

    340 F.2d 91 (5th Cir. 1964)   Cited 13 times

    No. 21342. December 18, 1964. Sam Williamson, Houston, Elmo Schwab, Barker, Barker Coltzer, Galveston, Tex. for appellant. James R. Gough, Asst. U.S. Atty., Woodrow Seals, U.S. Atty., Morton L. Susman, Asst. U.S. Atty., Houston, Tex., for appellees. Before HUTCHESON, WISDOM and GEWIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This is an appeal from an opinion and order denying relief under a petition for habeas corpus filed by appellant in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. This

  6. United States v. Murff

    176 F. Supp. 253 (S.D.N.Y. 1959)   Cited 18 times
    Holding that alien paroled and released on bond pending exclusion proceedings was "still, in theory of law, ‘on the threshold of initial entry.’ " (quoting Shaughnessy v. United States ex rel. Mezei , 345 U.S. 206, 212, 73 S.Ct. 625, 97 L.Ed. 956 (1953) )

  7. Conceiro v. Marks

    360 F. Supp. 454 (S.D.N.Y. 1973)   Cited 4 times
    In Conceiro v. Marks, 360 F. Supp. 454 (S.D.N.Y. 1973) (Wyatt, J.), habeas corpus relief was denied because the court could find no abuse of discretion in the district director's denial of parole to an excludable political asylum applicant.

  8. Glavic v. Beechie

    225 F. Supp. 24 (S.D. Tex. 1963)   Cited 8 times

    Civ. A. No. 63-H-515. December 31, 1963. Barker, Barker Coltzer, Elmo Schwab, Jr., Galveston, Tex., and Sam Williamson, Houston, Tex., for plaintiff. Woodrow Seals, U.S. Atty. for Southern Dist. of Texas, Morton L. Susman, Houston, Tex., for defendants. NOEL, District Judge. This action is brought by an alien seaman in an attempt to obtain a hearing before a special inquiry officer of the Immigration and Naturalization Service on his request for parole into the United States. Plaintiff alleges that

  9. Lazarescu v. United States

    199 F.2d 898 (4th Cir. 1952)   Cited 18 times
    Finding that entry through inspection by an immigration officer did not make entry lawful

  10. Klapholz v. Esperdy

    302 F.2d 928 (2d Cir. 1962)   Cited 5 times

    No. 324, Docket 27399. Argued April 26, 1962. Decided May 18, 1962. Jackson G. Cook, New York City (Stuart Wadler, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant. Roy Babitt, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City (Robert M. Morgenthau, U.S. Atty., for the S.D. of New York, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee. Before SMITH, KAUFMAN and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This is an appeal from a summary judgment which dismissed a complaint seeking review of an exclusion order

  11. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,718 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

  12. Section 100.4 - Field offices

    8 C.F.R. § 100.4   Cited 62 times

    (a)Ports-of-Entry for aliens arriving by vessel or by land transportation. Subject to the limitations prescribed in this paragraph, the following places are hereby designated as Ports-of-Entry for aliens arriving by any means of travel other than aircraft. The designation of such a Port-of-Entry may be withdrawn whenever, in the judgment of the Commissioner, such action is warranted. The ports are listed according to location by districts and are designated either Class A, B, or C. Class A means