§
In re Obshatko

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nijhawan v. Holder

    557 U.S. 29 (2009)   Cited 581 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a statute requires "a circumstance-specific approach" where it refers to "conduct involved 'in' the commission of the offense of conviction, rather than to the elements of the offense"

  2. Xiao Ji Chen v. United States Department of Justice

    471 F.3d 315 (2d Cir. 2006)   Cited 2,049 times
    Holding that determination of the weight of evidence is largely a matter of agency discretion

  3. Hoodho v. Holder

    558 F.3d 184 (2d Cir. 2009)   Cited 105 times
    Holding in case where alien was represented by counsel, that "an IJ does not err by accepting an alien's concession of removability when that concession is not plainly contradicted by record evidence"

  4. Garcia-Hernandez v. Boente

    847 F.3d 869 (7th Cir. 2017)   Cited 8 times
    Deciding that the state court determined petitioner violated the stay-away portion of a restraining order where he pleaded guilty to violating the order, and relying on the charging document to determine what behavior the court determined he engaged in

  5. Cespedes v. Lynch

    805 F.3d 1274 (10th Cir. 2015)   Cited 4 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 14–9604. 2015-11-19 Jose Ramon CESPEDES, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, United States Attorney General, Respondent. Lance C. Starr, Lance C. Starr, LLC, American Fork, UT, for Petitioner. Tim Ramnitz, Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, (Shelley R. Goad, Assistant Director, with him on the brief), U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. HARTZ Lance C. Starr, Lance C. Starr, LLC, American Fork, UT, for Petitioner. Tim Ramnitz, Attorney, Office of

  6. Radojkovic v. Holder

    599 F. App'x 646 (9th Cir. 2015)

    No. 11-72335 03-24-2015 DEJAN RADOJKOVIC, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. NOT FOR PUBLICATION Agency No. A028-211-730 MEMORANDUM On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Argued and Submitted February 10, 2015 San Francisco California Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and TASHIMA and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. Dejan Radojkovic, a

  7. Section 1101 - Definitions

    8 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 16,374 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status

  8. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,726 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

  9. Section 1227 - Deportable aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1227   Cited 7,895 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Granting this discretion to the Attorney General