From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Murray

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 28, 2001
251 F.3d 156 (5th Cir. 2001)

Summary

holding that, because defendant police officer did not use excessive force or unlawfully detain the plaintiff, the defendant county was entitled to summary judgment

Summary of this case from Sharkey v. Humphreys Cnty.

Opinion

No. 00-10675.

February 28, 2001.

Appeal from N.D.Tex., 107 F.Supp.2d 748.



Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.


Summaries of

Thomas v. Murray

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 28, 2001
251 F.3d 156 (5th Cir. 2001)

holding that, because defendant police officer did not use excessive force or unlawfully detain the plaintiff, the defendant county was entitled to summary judgment

Summary of this case from Sharkey v. Humphreys Cnty.

holding that, because defendant police officer did not use excessive force or unlawfully detain the plaintiff, the defendant county was entitled to summary judgment on plaintiff's ratification claim

Summary of this case from Malbrough v. City of Rayne
Case details for

Thomas v. Murray

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS v. MURRAY

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Feb 28, 2001

Citations

251 F.3d 156 (5th Cir. 2001)

Citing Cases

Sharkey v. Humphreys Cnty.

See Alpha v. Hooper, 440 F.3d 670, 672 (5th Cir. 2006) (upholding summary judgment for the defendant county…

Malbrough v. City of Rayne

The Rios court also noted that, in Collins v. City of Harker Heights, the Supreme Court stated that, "if a…