From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schlamp v. Prince George's Cty

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Apr 20, 2009
322 F. App'x 312 (4th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 08-2147.

Submitted: April 16, 2009.

Decided: April 20, 2009.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (1:06-cv-01644-DKC).

John Ryan Schlamp, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Bock Karpinski, Karpinski, Colaresi Karp, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


John Ryan Schlamp appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Schlamp's motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Schlamp v. Prince George's County, Maryland, No. 1:06-cv-01644-DKC (D.Md. Sept. 11, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

We decline to consider issues Schlamp raises for the first time on appeal.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Schlamp v. Prince George's Cty

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Apr 20, 2009
322 F. App'x 312 (4th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

Schlamp v. Prince George's Cty

Case Details

Full title:John Ryan SCHLAMP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Apr 20, 2009

Citations

322 F. App'x 312 (4th Cir. 2009)

Citing Cases

Howard v. City of Durham

No. 3:11-03295-MBS, 2012 WL 4479070, at *2-3, *11 (D.S.C. Sept. 28, 2012) (in § 1983 claim, finding probable…