From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lucas v. Townsend

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Sep 12, 1991
943 F.2d 38 (11th Cir. 1991)

Opinion

No. 89-8556.

September 12, 1991.

Neil Bradley, Kathleen Wilde, American Civ. Liberties Union Foundation, Inc., Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiffs-appellants.

W. Warren Plowden, Jr., Jones, Cork Miller, Craig N. Cowart, Edward S. Sell, Jr., Macon, Ga., Della Wager Wells, King Spalding, Atlanta, Ga., for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia; Wilbur D. Owens, Jr., Chief Judge.

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before HATCHETT, Circuit Judge, RONEY and FAIRCHILD, Senior Circuit Judges.

See Rule 34-2(b), Rules of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.

Honorable Thomas E. Fairchild, Senior U.S. Circuit Judge for the Seventh Circuit, sitting by designation.


In its recent opinion in this case ( Board of Public Education and Orphanage for Bibb County, et al. v. Lucas, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 2845, 115 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1991)), the Supreme Court of the United States stated:

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for the clarification of the jurisdiction issue presented by the Solicitor General in his brief for the United States, as amicus curiae, filed June 4, 1991.

The jurisdiction issue the Supreme Court refers to is presented in our opinion Lucas v. Townsend, 908 F.2d 851, 858 (11th Cir. 1990), footnote 7. On remand, if the district court finds that the constitutional claims were waived, appellate jurisdiction in this court is proper because no claims will remain outstanding in the district court. On the other hand, if the district court finds that the constitutional claims have not been waived, it must resolve those claims and upon notification of this finding, this court will dismiss this appeal to allow further proceedings in the district court. Should the district court decide to enter a new order disposing of the section 2 claims and to make it final and appealable pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) and the plaintiffs should again appeal, this court would consider the issue on the present briefs, supplemented as the parties may desire.

REMANDED TO THE DISTRICT COURT WITH INSTRUCTIONS.


Summaries of

Lucas v. Townsend

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Sep 12, 1991
943 F.2d 38 (11th Cir. 1991)
Case details for

Lucas v. Townsend

Case Details

Full title:DAVID LUCAS, WILLIE DAVIS, JR., CONNIE CATER, CORLIS McKENZIE, AND RONNIE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Sep 12, 1991

Citations

943 F.2d 38 (11th Cir. 1991)

Citing Cases

Lucas v. Townsend

Upon being advised by the district court that plaintiffs' constitutional claims remained to be decided, we…