From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lee v. City of Norwalk, Ohio

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division
Sep 9, 2011
Case No. 3:11 CV 897 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 9, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 3:11 CV 897.

September 9, 2011


ORDER


The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation ("R R") of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 15). Under the relevant statute ( 28 U.S.C. § 636(C)):

Within fourteen days after being served with a copy, any party may serve and file written objections to such proposed findings and recommendations as provided by rules of court. A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.

The failure to file written objections constitutes a waiver of a de novo determination by the district court of an issue covered in the R R. United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984 (6th Cir. 2005).

The Court has reviewed the R R, finds it to be correct, and adopts it in its entirety. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 13) is granted and Plaintiffs' claims alleging assault and battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress are dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lee v. City of Norwalk, Ohio

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division
Sep 9, 2011
Case No. 3:11 CV 897 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 9, 2011)
Case details for

Lee v. City of Norwalk, Ohio

Case Details

Full title:Mimi L. Lee, et al., Plaintiffs, v. City of Norwalk, Ohio, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Sep 9, 2011

Citations

Case No. 3:11 CV 897 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 9, 2011)

Citing Cases

Saalim v. Walmart, Inc.

Id. at *3; see also Lee v. City of Norwalk, No. 3:11 CV 897, 2011 WL 4007786, at *1-2 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 25,…